There have been the rumblings of a seismic shift in the employee engagement and internal communications arena for several years now. Digital technologies are expanding our opportunities, consumer power and influence grows apace, and traditional organisational structures and hierarchies creak under the strain of 21st century business velocities. The contract among employers, employees, investors, stakeholders and customers is being re-written.
How do we deal with this shift?
There has always been debate about how to structure and manage corporate communications and where various functional responsibilities should sit – across human resources, media relations, corporate social responsibility, brand, sales and marketing. And although different organisations manage this accountability in slightly different ways – sometimes internal communications sits in a corporate communications function, sometimes in the HR or marketing functions — the lines between employees, stakeholders, customers, competitors, regulators and media have been seen to be relatively distinct. These relationships have also been relatively manageable within these distinct silos. They didn’t require much cooperation internally to manage well.
But in the previous three years, and with startlingly increased velocity in 2006, the lines weren’t just blurred – in some cases, they disappeared completely.
It’s a truism to say consumer power is growing. What’s less clear is whether the majority of organisations have made the connection between this growth in consumer influence, and the way these organisations manage their stakeholder relationships (and indeed their businesses).
This shift in consumer power has a direct connection with employees, contractors, third party relationships and how the organisation operates in its environment. The model is no longer one where the organisation sits at the centre and neat lines drawn to discrete stakeholders.

Now, everyone is wearing a lot of hats. Consumers are now media producers – and very influential ones. Stakeholders and partners are now consumers – and, of course, influential media producers. These “stakeholders” may not be who you think they are, and quite possibly are not who they used to be. Your supplier may not only be a competitor and a customer, but my be representing your brand and contributing, positively or negatively, to your organisation’s reputation.
In most organisations today, the way these stakeholder relationships are managed is woefully inadequate to deal with the way these complex relationships have evolved and matured. This is precisely what is causing friction internally within organisations: Who is accountable for making sure that the customer experience is delivered? Product design (“The features are what people want”)? Sales and marketing (“We need to increase turnover”)? Human resources (“We need to attract great people, and keep the ones we have”)? Call centre staff (“Who do customers call when they have a problem”)? Front of house or retail staff (“You never get a second chance to make a first impression”)? Facilities (“A good retail and working environment is key”)? Finance and credit control (“Have you seen the letter we send our valued customers when they miss a payment”)? Digital and web teams (”We are the key touchpoint for our customers”)? The executive suite (”It’s all about leadership.”)?

The answer, of course, is that all of these people own the customer experience, in one way or another. The problem is, if the organisation hasn’t sorted itself out, the person bearing the brunt of the poor organisation design and process is – you guessed it – the customer. And you can only irritate them for so long before they go somewhere else, or your competitors design a better experience for them.
What does all this have to do with internal communications? And why is it “dead”?
Many functional internal communication leaders today have come from a publishing, journalism, or PR background (and increasingly from Marketing disciplines). And in general, internal communication functions have been managed – and often managed very effectively – as information and knowledge publishers. Of course, most internal communication operations are very good at managing “two way communication,” ensuring that employee surveys track how things are going and what drives the right results to the bottom line; supporting senior leaders and line managers in their communication roles; providing opportunities for the employee to be heard. “Best Practice” is well and truly bedded in, and blogs, wikis, and ‘MySpace for the corporation’ are all adding new approaches to the mix.
But internal communication people need to stop thinking about ourselves as internal communicators. Because we’re simply not anymore. And we shouldn’t be. Internal communicators should see themselves as business people with a specific communication, involvement and engagement business process focus.
It’s no longer about crafting the right messages, ensuring they are delivered using the right channels at the right time, and getting feedback and “engagement.” Internal communicators need to start thinking of themselves as business process support (and in some cases, design) experts and part of the team that directly enables the organisation and its stakeholders to deliver the best possible customer experience.
Of course, much of this is still going to be about moving the right content around the organisation and enabling people to get at that content more quickly and easily. And a lot of it will still have to do with getting news out, getting news in, and listening relentlessly.
But a lot of it is equally about assessing what interaction is taking place among what stakeholders – internally and externally – and to ensure that those interactions are supported in a way that relentlessly points at the heart and mind of the customer. This must be more than just a campaign about being “customer centric.” It’s got to be more than an initiative to define, articulate and deliver an “employer brand” and an employee experience. These are important parts of the equation, of course.
But if we are truly to thrive and face the challenges of 2007 and beyond, as internal communicators, we need to become part management consultant, part HR professional, part IT consultant, part brand manager, part organisational psychologist, part executive coach, part media relations expert … and part accountant.
We need to get outside our box, without apology, and stick our noses into other peoples’ business. Because everybody in the organisation, and many of our stakeholders who aren’t necessarily on our distribution lists, helps us deliver our customer experience and our “brand” — which is, after all, our reputation.
—–
Originally published here

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
13 May, 2007 at 4:22 pm
Mark Ragan
Kevin,
Fascinating blog post, and I couldn’t agree more with every one of your observations. There is a seismic shift not only in corporate communications but in the general media that covers the industry—like us, the writers and editors and conference folks at Chicago based Ragan Communications. We no longer feel that we control the information flow. In fact, we don’t. Our customers do. And instead of fighing it, we revel in it. We actually want to be the architects of the community that digital technology and Social Media have now made so possible. Thanks for an interesting essay.
Mark Ragan
CEO
Ragan Communications
14 May, 2007 at 10:45 am
kevinkeohane
… or if not archiects, at least be part of the conversation! Thanks for the reply.
17 June, 2007 at 3:35 pm
Graeme Ginsberg
Hi Kevin
Very interesting indeed. I wonder then, with the scope and responsibility of the internal communication function expanding so much, if one of the implications might be too shocking for internal communicators to grapple with. As your essay suggests, internal communicators now need to really understand what’s involved in creating a corporate strategy, implementing complex product/market development initiatives, and balancing various stakeholder wants and needs. But can this be taught? Can the internal communicators from journalism and PR backgrounds who currently populate internal communication departments really learn these things – can they achieve the level of business literacy necessary for the modern communication arena? If, as I suspect to be the case, they can’t, isn’t it time for them to step aside and make way for those with ‘hard’ operational management experience and strategic consulting experience? Surely these experienced front-line business personnel can learn internal communication skills relatively easily while internal communicators can’t suddenly acquire the business experience.
Changing the personnel (at the senior level too) would be the true death of internal communication as we know it.
Graeme
Managing Editor, Research & Reports
Melcrum
17 June, 2007 at 4:12 pm
Response to “The end of internal communication” article - discussion? « Death to internal marketing
[...] Ginsberg Says: June 17th, 2007 at 3:35 pm Hi [...]
19 June, 2007 at 6:47 pm
Angela Sinickas
I absolutely agree that all communicators, internal and external, need to be business people, understanding financial matters, being strategic, all of it. I think the argument that business people can easily learn the “relatively easy” skills it takes to be an internal communicator has been proved absolutely wrong more times than I can count when management in its wisdom moved some business person to be in charge of organizational communication as a job-broadening step on the way to a higher-level position. They always remain sender-centric and don’t “get” the much better outcomes available from becoming audience-centric.
I have found that when PR and/or internal communication is subsumed into Marketing, the total focus shifts to the customer. And customers are not the only stakeholder group affecting our companies’ success. Other stakeholder groups’ needs stop being met and the business starts feeling financial pains on many fronts–not the least of which is the high cost of increased employee turnover. Plus, using the typical approach of Marketing with many stakeholder groups other than customers and prospects is a total disaster. These other groups, including employees, the media and financial analysts, start feeling that they’re getting a “hard sell job” and stop trusting the company. Long-nurtured relationships start feeling like transactions.
The separate communication functions excel when they really understand their stakeholder groups, and how best to communicate with them in a way that meets the stakeholders’ needs and the business’s needs. The communication function as a whole works well when the communicators work together to share their expertise and coordinate their multi-stakeholder communications that, combined, support all the needs of a successful organization–not only customers, as important as they are.
Angela Sinickas
http://www.sinicom.com
19 June, 2007 at 7:44 pm
kevinkeohane
Thanks Angela for an as usual well-considered comment. I’m running a similar conversation on MyRagan and pushed the point a bit further — are we getting too specialised as IC professionals to have the requisite knowledge to effectively do our jobs? Given the massive crossover of required skills, are we really ICers anymore?
I also want to pull you up on a point that is critical to the discussion — you say “… when management, in its wisdom …” — to me, the point is that internal communicators ARE management, and should think like managers — not an ‘us-and-them’ siege mentality where the practitioner is the advocate of the hardworking employee, defender of their rights against the oppressive moneymongerers on high. (Just being a bit dramatic as usual).
1 July, 2007 at 2:51 am
Eileen Chadnick
Right on Kevin!! Love the Venn! I couldn’t agree more with you…
Where do I apply for such a job? Lol….seriously though, as it happens I am self employed and try to create my own work-life where I get to use a vast array of those many skills/knowledge areas you metnioned…..I think to be truly effective one can’t fit into just one box (i.e. communications or marketing or coaching; etc.).
As it happens, my own career tapestry has transversed over a few professional realms…have a ton of insight, knowledge (and still learning every day of course) that lends itself to the art and science of employee engagement….but haven’t yet seen an ad that recognizes and/or calls for that blend of skills. Instead, most ads (that I’ve seen anyways) seem very one-dimensional. Blech. Suffocation. Gasp. Air please!
And that is why I am trying to create my own work-life. But maybe the world will evolve…..and so I’ll still check those IABC job board ads now and again cuz you just never know
To a tgim work life!
Eileen
Big Cheese Coaching and Chadnick Communications
20 February, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Facing up to competition … « Inside out
[...] can read more about what the future might hold for our profession on my blog, and on Kevin Keohane’s blog … and probably many more [...]